default property for wiki field

First: thread:379
Feedback from naive user
Edited: 26 Oct 2011 12:41 by: Sheepdog
Comments: 3
Tags:

««

« Feedback from naive user
« using form_data value for "Select" and "Order" of Listpage
« Revision comments
« Data Forms in include
« Hidden field - changes improvements

Previous: thread:364
Hidden field - changes improvements
Edited: 09 Jun 2010 11:24 by: leiger
Comments: 1
Tags:

Last: thread:141
Which aspects of this design do people want first?
Edited: 11 Nov 2009 12:44 by: leiger
Comments: 14
Tags:

»»

why does %%form_data{variable}%% render in its own <p> block? »
editor buttons for wiki-type-form-field »
consistent width »
replicate the page-edit experience »
Static Wiki Field Type »
Recommended Documentation Changes »
Static Fields »
'editable' property (all field types) »
Hint Text »
Styling a Form with CSS Module »

Next: thread:356
why does %%form_data{variable}%% render in its own <p> block?
Edited: 02 May 2010 22:43 by: suef
Comments: 5
Tags:

scottplan wrote on 06 May 2010 13:41

Many field types allow for a default field. Why not provide for defaults in the wiki type?

Considering that wiki coding involves a learning curve, it seems like this would be the most relevant place to offer default text, so users could work within it and modify as appropriate.

Start a new sub-thread

Comments: 1

GoVegan 06 May 2010 14:15

True, this is practically applying a "static template" to the wiki field type — something that is already possible with non-data form pages.